Note that if the default grows, there will be no alternative but to implement the increase as necessary to meet the needs and commitments of the Condominium.

Irreconcilable disputes that turn the property into a real battlefield, as if cats and dogs. The Federal District’s condominium law, it is complacent and contradictory in its Article 23, Section VIII, which states: “The joint owners are prohibited from owning animals for their number, size or nature of the conditions affecting safety, health or comfort of the condominium or of the condominium. It is subjective, not to determine when possession of animals, injured the previous concepts and contradictory because if the condominium law is to regulate, among other provisions, the coexistence of the homeowners, left to the discretion of the possibility of owning their pets, making departments in real zoos.

Housing units have been affected by the problem of dogs are 5 for only a few. The joint owners report that the walkers pass through these urban complexes is uncertain. In 90% of pet dog owners to take responsibility. Even though you can not generalize, the truth is that there is availability, responsibility and prudence in owning a pet. Those affected, indicate that coupled with the conflicts in the condominiums as recommended, is that legislators in the matter stipulated in the federal District condominium law, a ban on keeping pets. The law punishes the matter up with one hundred days of minimum wage when a master is not responsible for your pet, but in practice few or almost no one reports these cases. “Negligently” turtle “the authorities on the subject? One thing is certain, the best friend of man could leave if the housing units is said to be his “friend” not responsible.